Aachener aphasie test pdf
1.2.1 Aachener Aphasietest There are di erent types of Aphasia, depending on the region of the brain that is damaged. therapist diagnosed him with jargon- aphasia based on results from the “Aachener Aphasie Test” (Huber et al., 1983) which, after 6 months, developed into a Broca’s aphasia. Five additional potential participants were excluded, because severe perceptual or cognitive deﬁcits revealed by neuro-psychological testing did not allow their participation.
The task was to memorize complete sentences in reference to video clips shown in the mentioned program. We collected naming latencies of 81 healthy participants who performed the AAT naming subtest. This test allows the classification and quantification of standard and non-standard aphasic syndromes (global aphasia, amnestic aphasia, Wernicke's and conduction aphasia, transcortical aphasias). Results The results show a clear performance dissociation between tense and agreement. In the process of validating the adapted instrument, persons without aphasia and persons with aphasia in acute and chronic stages of the disease were tested. A randomised group of test persons, consisting of 6 persons with aphasia, completed a training pro-gram in an exactly structured manner with 50 hours of training in 12 days. Conclusions: The efficiency of MOAT and the long-term stability of improved language functions were demonstrated by means of the Aachener Aphasie Test and questionnaires about everyday communication. The examiner read a word, or a sentence and the patient had to recognize and to indicate the numbered target stimulus picture corresponding to a word or a sentence among distracters.
adverbial modifications and lexical cohesion, which were evaluated in detail.
By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services. Raw cognitive test scores were transformed into Z scores, and the mean Z score for each cognitive domain was calculated. These latencies were ana - lyzed for potential effects of age, education or gender. The primary end point was the token subtest of the Aachener Aphasia Test (AAT) as a measure of the severity of aphasia. Such normative data may be used to detect discrete anomia in an objective and clinically practicable way. Background and Purpose— In response to the established notion that improvement of language functions in chronic aphasia only can be achieved through long-term treatment, we examined the efficacy of a short-term, intensive language training, constraint-induced aphasia therapy (CIAT).
17 Language testing was performed more than 7 days after the last reported seizure. Therefore, the present study is aimed at collecting normative data for latencies in the naming subtest of the prevalent Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Patients were randomly assigned to groups that received either conventional treatment (n=7) or interactive video- telepractice (n=9), which was performed “online” in real time. These results were correlated with results of the sentence production tasks of the Aachen Aphasie Test before and after therapy. Additionally, several other aspects were chosen according to recent literature on aphasic spontaneous speech, e.g.